INDEX	August 4, 2025
Spooks play the death march
So two British colonels and an MI6 spook have been captured by the Russians in Ukraine. How stupid are the British government? It's one thing to have a few technical advisors helping Ukrainians use advanced munitions but another to have a recce party captured. Exactly why should Russia not bomb Britain, say one of the American bases currently bristling with nuclear weapons? NOTEI posted the above on Facebook but it was shadow banned. Nothing about this has appeared in the British media. The report (right) was found by Mike Kennard.	Scott Rickard Britain's Covert War: The Illegal Deployment of UK Officers in Ukraine and the Crisis of Accountability In a case that has ignited international scrutiny and sharp criticism, the United Kingdom stands accused of flagrantly violating international law through the covert deployment of military officers into active conflict zones in Ukraine. The recent capture of two British Army colonels—Edward Blake and Richard Carroll---by Russian special forces has laid bare a pattern of duplicity by the UK Ministry of Defence (MoD), and further exposed the British government's clandestine role in escalating the Ukraine--Russia war. Initially, the UK MoD insisted that Colonels Blake and Carroll were in London. However, photographic and forensic evidence presented by Russian authorities showed both officers in full military uniform, operating in a contested zone in Ukraine. The UK government quickly shifted its narrative, stating that the officers were simply "tourists visiting battle sites" — a claim met with international incredulity and domestic mockery.¹ Contrary to the UK's assertion, Russia publicized that the captured officers were in possession of classified NATO military planning documents and diplomatic passports—direct evidence undermining their civilian cover story and highlighting an organized military mission likely sanctioned at the highest levels of British command.² The diplomatic passports raise troubling questions about whether these operatives were acting under a false flag operation or were engaged in sabotage missions within Ukrainian territory under direct UK orders. When challenged further, the UK MoD pivoted once more, demanding that the captured officers be treated as prisoners of war (PoWs). However, the Russian Federation has formally rejected this classification, citing the Geneva Conventions and the illegality of unacknowledged combatants operating in a sovereign conflict zone without proper declaration.³ The Kremlin has designated them as unlawful combatants—a legal distinction with grave consequences. Russian legal officials have publicly declared that the planned sabotage operation uncovered from the officers' materials could warrant capital punishment under Russian military law.⁴ In a last--ditch effort to reclaim the captured officers, the UK reportedly offered a prisoner exchange, hoping to trade them for detained Russian personnel. Russia refused. A senior Russian security official was quoted stating, *"Planned sabotage does not warrant leniency. This is not a game of diplomacy; this is war. The noose is what they've earned."*⁵ Compounding the crisis is the revelation that a third British national, believed to be an MI6 officer, was also detained, although Russian sources have withheld personal details. The opacity surrounding this third detainee suggests a deeper, ongoing intelligence operation that the UK government is actively working to suppress from public discourse. This incident does not merely reflect rogue military adventurism; it reveals a disturbing normalization of unlawful foreign intervention by the British government. The deliberate misrepresentation, the invocation of diplomatic immunity, and the demand for PoW status for what were clearly covert military actors amount to a gross abuse of international norms and treaty obligations. If substantiated, these acts represent not only a violation of the UN Charter and the Geneva Conventions, but also a brazen effort by the UK to fuel proxy warfare under the guise of NATO solidarity. The case of Colonels Blake and Carroll must be understood as part of a broader pattern of illegal hybrid warfare tactics employed by Western powers that continue to undermine global stability and erode the integrity of international law. References 1. United Kingdom Ministry of Defence, Official Statement Archive – 2025. 2. Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Press Briefing on Captured Foreign Operatives, July 2025. 3. International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Legal Status of Unlawful Combatants, 2024. 4. Russian Military Code of Justice, Section on Espionage and Sabotage, Revised 2023. 5. Kommersant News, "Captured British Officers to Face Trial for Military Espionage," July 28, 2025.
INDEX Jonathan Brind	August 4, 2025